Newsletter - June 2002
Welcome to the Six Sigma Systems, Inc. Electronic
Newsletter "The Integrator." Feel free to forward this to others who might have
an interest in the topic.
Announcement!
Six Sigma Systems, Inc. is glad to announce a
partnership with ManagementSystems Consulting Corporation (MSCC). As a result,
the topic of this newsletter is corporate culture. Many process improvement
practitioners like yourself have struggled over the years to design and
implement technically superior processes, hindered by cultural issues. For many,
corporate culture appears to be an unchangeable fact of life. MSCC, through
years of experience and research, has developed methods that can be applied to
assess and subsequently design and change corporate culture. They have also
proven a relationship between financial success of a company and corporate
culture. Below please find a brief explanation of their methods. In reviewing
their methods, you will also see that the philosophy of Six Sigma and Lean play
a significant role in the model suggested by MSCC.
If you would like to research these thoughts in
more detail, you will find the link to MSCC at
here.
The Six Building Blocks of Organizational
Success:
Why are some organizations successful and others
not successful over the long-term? Why did Starbucks succeed while Boston Market
went into bankruptcy? Why has Wal-Mart become dominant, while K-Mart is
struggling to survive? The answer lies in the ability to manage six building
blocks of organizational success. In fact, research suggests that there is a 99%
chance that the management of these six “building blocks” explains
organizational success.
These six building blocks – organized into a
Pyramid of Organizational Success – are:
- Identifying a market that the company will
serve.
- Developing products and/or services to meet
the needs of the chosen market.
- Acquiring and effectively managing the
resources (human, financial, and physical) needed to support the firm’s
growth.
- Implementing effective day-to-day operational
systems (e.g., sales, accounting, production, information systems, etc.).
- Effectively utilizing four management systems
– planning, structure, management development, and performance management
systems – to support the firm’s long-term development.
- Understanding and effectively managing the
firm’s corporate culture.
Building a successful firm over the long-term
involves developing and implementing a strategic plan that defines the steps
that will be taken to build the firm’s capabilities within all of the six
building blocks contained in the Pyramid of Organizational Success We call this
type of plan a. “strategic organizational development plan” because it is
comprehensive unlike traditional strategic plans, which tend to focus most
attention on markets and products.
The rationale for developing and using this type
of plan is simple: for a firm to be successful over the long-term, it needs to
focus on all six building blocks. If all are effectively managed, then the
chances of becoming a Starbucks are enhanced.
If you have questions, comments, or submissions
for this Newsletter send an e-mail to
marjgreen@sixsigmasystems.com
with "COMMENT" in the subject line.
If you have topics that you would like to see
covered in future issues please let us know. Be sure to visit the Discussion
Forum by clicking here. Be involved by posting questions and getting in
discussions.
BACK TO TOP
Newsletter - May 2002
Six Sigma in Transactional /
Business / Service Processes.
Six Sigma has and still is
revolutionizing industry and taking process quality to new levels. Many
organizations not involved in manufacturing are beginning to apply Six Sigma to
their processes, hoping to achieve the kind of results that ‘traditional’
implementations have yielded. Because of the challenges associated with this
target rich area there have been both successes and failures. We will look here
at a few of the elements that must be considered for success in this arena.
There are many others to consider and as such this list is not intended to be
comprehensive.
The logic of Six Sigma, is of
course, applicable to the non-manufacturing arena and can be used to drive
significant customer and financial improvement. Process behaviors are
independent of what is being processed and thus process variation inhibits
process performance regardless of the specific process. That said however, there
are historic, organizational, skill and requirement differences that need to be
considered when implementing Six Sigma in the transactional, administrative or
business process world.
When considering the reasons for the
success of Six Sigma, one must think about the critical elements. One of those
elements is the structure and discipline associated with a quality Six Sigma
implementation. The structure provides a framework that can be used for driving
project work while the discipline ensures projects are consistently moved
forward. Both of those elements still play a key role in transactional
implementation, however the differences to traditional implementations must now
be managed. The first thing to note is that many of the projects - especially
those with substantial financial payoff are, cross-functional in nature. By
default, several organizational units will be involved and additional tools and
management support besides those found in traditional programs are now required
for the teams. Since change must often times be made in many organizational
units, in some cases even requiring organizational realignment, tools to ensure
success for those tasks must now be included in the program. Along the same
lines, project management tools must now expand from an individual contributor
base to team based project management.
Another key piece of Six Sigma is
the element of measurement itself. While many measurement systems in the
manufacturing / design arena are not capable, a base to improve often times does
exist. The concept of measurement quality, at least in concept, is often times
known. Once we make the transition and apply Six Sigma in the transactional
world, measurements, especially for the purpose of gaining process knowledge and
process improvement, are often rare. Many measurements must be implemented,
assessed, etc. Furthermore many measurements are attribute in nature, which
again requires additional technical methods.
Data acquisition and analysis
techniques must often times be complemented with techniques feasible in
environments where direct manipulation is not possible. An array of tools is
available to assist the improvement practitioner, but the appropriateness should
be assessed based on the business type and the data availability prior to
inclusion in the program. Examples of required techniques may be Least Squares
or Cluster Analysis, just to name a few.
For more information on this topic,
call us at 913.685.9280 or 602.789.9884 with any questions or
comments you may have regarding this topic.
BACK TO TOP